Sophia Rich

Starting Model UN Through A Computer Screen

By: Sophia Rich

Every year, high-school aged delegates from all over the country come to Ann Arbor to attend the annual Model United Nations conference at the University of Michigan. MUNUM takes place at the beginning of the high school conference season and tends to set the tone for the rest of the year’s conferences. This weekend is notably memorable for first year delegates, primarily freshmen. In addition to all the skills and experiences these first-year delegates pick up in committee, participation in naturally occurring, unscripted events allow for these delegates to get a good understanding of the MUNUM culture! Due to Covid-19, the 2021 MUNUM conference has been moved completely online. Although everyone leading the conference this year has done a great job, this year’s conference is inevitably different than years in the past. For this column, I wanted to take a deeper dive into what it’s like to go through your first real Model UN conference virtually!

For all delegates, your first Model UN conference can be extremely overwhelming. Now imagine going through this brand new experience in a virtual setting, as much as we try to lessen the tension, these digital interactions often feel forced and robotic. I had the opportunity to talk to a few first-time MUNUM delegates and get a glimpse into their experience in committee this year. I started off by asking these delegates about their level of comfort speaking and participating in their committee. I got a wide range of answers but most delegates found that their first time speaking was the hardest bit it kind of took off from there. Alexandre Morrison, a first year delegate in UNGASS, shared with me that, “It’s hard to start speaking in a committee, but once I first spoke, it became easier. One time kind of builds momentum and helps me gain confidence while doing it.” A lot of delegates I chatted with also expressed some level of difficulty trying to remember parliamentary procedure, they said that sometimes they hesitate to speak up in committee because they don’t always know exactly how to phrase it. When reflecting on these answers from a personal perspective, I found that this specific piece of MUN doesn’t really differ from in-person conferences to virtual conferences. I encouraged these delegates to just go for it! I reassured them that their chairs are always supporting them and would be willing to help remind them of proper parliamentary procedure.

The area in which these freshman delegates expressed their feelings of missing out was the recreational side of MUN. When asked if they made friends or reached out to other delegates, a lot of them hesitated, they told me that the recreational moments felt awkward and they had trouble connecting with other delegates. Parini Rao, a freshman delegate from Greenhills School, told me that, “It’s weird having to start Model UN online. I’ve never done it before, so it’s also been hard to really understand what it is like solely through zoom. Since we are online I feel like we’re missing out on other team bonding moments and being involved.” I think Parini summed up the freshman experience pretty well. Although a lot of these first-time delegates felt a little unsure at first they are all extremely thankful for the MUNUM staff for putting this conference together! Yes, MUNUM feels different this year but everyone I talked to still had a great weekend and can’t wait to come back next year!

A Cooperative Committee

By: Sophia Rich

This morning starting off with a huge shock for delegates in the 2011 Japanese Reconstruction Agency, a local news channel alerted the committee that another Tsunami had just hit Japan causing a critical dent in Japan’s food supply and leaving many Japanese people in search of their next meal. In response to this drop, delegates were given two options: To try and alleviate Japan's agricultural problems or to move forward and deal with long term solutions, after a unanimous decision, the delegates from the Japanese Reconstruction Agency set out a plan to spend the rest of this committee session on working towards long term solutions!

After spending no more than 5 minutes in this committee, it was immensely clear that this was a group of like-minded delegates working towards a reasonable and ethical solution. The Tohoku earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear disaster had left a lasting effect on all of the delegate’s people whom they represent and it was abundantly obvious that this was a united committee in which the primary focus was the people of Japan. Ideas arose quickly after this news drop, delegates decided to focus on two pillars of stability: How to shift towards a cleaner energy system (long-term) and how to mitigate this social and economic damage (short-term).

In terms of shifting towards a cleaner energy system, delegates immediately began to brainstorm, and new proposals flooded the discussion room. It was in unanimous agreement that nuclear energy was no longer an effective option for the nation of Japan to rely on. Delegate Mizuho Fukushima suggested that this committee focus on wind energy as it is applicable to Japan’s environment and  wind speeds near water are reliably successful and fast. Modern solutions such as geothermal and hydroelectric power were also brought up in committee but were only explored on the surface level. It is agreed upon in committee that nuclear energy was a direct cause of this explosion and it must be eliminated in some form. A gradual decrease of nuclear energy use was also proposed in committee and was well received by most delegates. 

Delegates also felt it was necessary to address some of the more urgent damage that needed to be taken care of. Japanese working class people, primarily people working in Agriculture have been put out of work and these delegated are determined to find short-term solutions that can relieve some of this economic uncertainty. An extremely innovative idea brought up by multiple delegates was to give people who had lost their jobs new jobs in areas of reconstruction and damage control, this would allow for short-term relief while also working towards long-term solutions! 

The Japanese Reconstruction Agency is filled with innovative delegates seeking an ethical approach to these issues, as the day passes this committee will surely pass effective resolutions and address these urgent environmental issues!

UNGASS Debates Illicit Influence from the First Russian Czech Bank

By: Sophia Rich

The United Nations Special Session General Assembly Against Corruption (UNGASS) was introduced in 2018 and was created to address corruption in the international, private, and public sectors. Today, these delegates from nations all over the world set out to tackle two major topics: illicit influence from the first Russian Czech bank and preventative measures of corruption and warfare.

The first half of today’s committee primarily focused on illicit influence from the First Russian Czech Bank. A controversial topic to all, debates immediately arose regarding elitists in Russia and their knowledge of this internal corruption. Delegates from Belarus and Germany immediately blamed Russian elitists for their knowledge of this financial corruption, and they continuously called them out for their lack of action. This form of financial corruption blatantly benefits Russian elitists and therefore leads them to ignore this issue and combat it with self-serving greed. This disputable topic caused quite a spark in the committee and eventually led to some strongly-worded debate, with the delegate from Russia rushing to defend their nation.

The next topic that was brought to the floor was the importance of transparency from the Russian government. The delegate from Tanzania set the stage for this moderated caucus by saying that, “we cannot act upon what we cannot see.” This sparked an intense debate on whether Russian transparency would be an effective solution to this issue, and with some delegates arguing that transparency alone is not enough, this debate seemed to be divisive within the committee. The majority of the delegates began to lean towards the idea of sanctions along with accountability. The delegate from the United States felt strongly that as one of the world's leading powers, the U.S. needed to step up in this committee and help lead everyone to a reasonable and ethical solution. This delegate argued that to hold Russia accountable, this committee must first threaten them with sanctions to prove the severity of this specific case of corruption. The energy was high and the debate was lively in UNGASS today, showcasing the probable high-stakes for the next two days.